What Is getAIwork?
getAIwork is two products sold as one. The first is a job board for AI work - model evaluation, data annotation, expert interviews, AI training - screened and refreshed daily, free to browse with no account. The second is a $49/month membership that wraps courses, a certification and a member community around that board.
Only the first one is free, and the first one is the better product. That is the whole review in two sentences, but the detail underneath is worth reading because the board does several things its competitors do not.
At the time of review the board showed 1,662 live listings, timestamped to the minute of its last refresh. The operator states 36,753 posts have been screened to reach that number, and that filled listings are deleted daily rather than left to accumulate.
Who It Is For
Three groups, in descending order of fit.
Licensed professionals - doctors, lawyers, accountants, engineers - who want AI contract income without retraining. The board carries "Licensed Profession" as its own background filter, which is not something general job boards offer, and the expert-interview listings are where the money on this board actually is.
People looking for AI data work - annotation, evaluation, red teaming. General tech boards bury this under machine learning engineering roles that have nothing to do with it. Here it is a first-class category with its own filter.
Career changers considering the membership - the group with the most to weigh up, and the section on pricing below is written for them.
The Board: What It Actually Does Well
Five filters that match how people search. Type (freelance gig, AI training platform, part-time or junior role), Skill (writing, automation, image and visuals, voice and video, AI data work), Background (generalist, coding, STEM, licensed profession, language), Level (beginner, intermediate, advanced), and Country including remote. Background as a separate axis from Skill is the smart call - it lets a radiologist find work priced on being a radiologist rather than on knowing Python.
Pay is shown as listed, and labelled as such. Every card carries the poster's stated range with the line "exactly as the poster lists it, if accepted. We never estimate pay, and results vary." That discipline is rare. Most boards in this category either hide pay or publish an estimate that flatters the listing.
Source attribution on every listing. Cards read "via micro1" or "via Mercor". This matters for an honest reason covered under Limitations, but crediting the source at all is more transparency than most aggregators offer.
A last-refreshed timestamp to the minute. Small thing, and the single fastest way to tell whether a board is maintained.
The Number That Matters Most
Two listings visible on the same screen at the time of review:
- Robot Whisperer - Skills & Data (via micro1) - freelance gig, AI data work, beginner, remote. Listed pay $10-$20/hour.
- Cybersecurity Practitioner: Paid Expert Interviews (via Mercor) - freelance gig, writing, intermediate, US. Listed pay $125-$175/hour.
That is a 10x spread on the same board on the same day, and it is the most useful thing getAIwork surfaces. The entry-level annotation work that dominates "make money with AI" content pays about what you would expect. The work that pays properly is the work where you are being paid for a credential you already hold - the expert interviews, the licensed-profession evaluation.
Read as listed rates, not earnings. A posted range is what a contract advertises, not what anyone banked after calibration rounds, rejected batches and gaps between projects. getAIwork says this on every card, which is to its credit.
We cover this category in more depth in our guide to the highest paying AI jobs in 2026.
Pricing
| Tier |
Cost |
What you get |
| Work Board |
Free |
Full board, all filters, all listings. No account, no card. |
| Membership |
$49/month |
Course library, getAIwork Certification, templates and prompt packs, member community. 60-day money-back guarantee, cancel any time. |
One plan, no tiers, cancel in two clicks. Checkout runs through Digistore24 so the operator never handles card details. The 60-day guarantee is unusually long for this category and is the strongest thing about the offer - it is longer than it takes to find out whether the thing works for you.
The Editorial Rules Are the Best Thing on the Site
getAIwork publishes its own editorial rules, and they are stricter than most publishers in this space operate under:
- No income promises - "we never tell you what you will earn. Nobody honest can."
- Pay figures are as-listed only, sourced from live postings or the platforms' own published rates, with dates
- Job-market numbers come from their own live board, refreshed on a schedule
- Every article written and approved by a named person
- Member results published only when real, with names attached
- Cancelling takes two clicks - no retention calls, no dark patterns
A site in the "make money with AI" category that leads with "we will never tell you how much money you will make" is choosing the harder commercial position on purpose. The founder is named, photographed, reachable by direct email, with a registered business address in Bangalore. In a category built on anonymous funnels, that is worth something.
Limitations
It is an aggregator, and it says so. Listings come via micro1, Mercor and other platforms. You could go to those sources directly and pay nothing. What getAIwork adds is screening, one view across several sources, and the filters - genuinely useful, but it is curation rather than exclusive inventory, and nobody should pay a membership expecting listings they cannot find elsewhere.
The certification is the weakest part of the offer. Graded by a human on real project work, which is a better design than a multiple-choice quiz. But a certification's value is recognition, and a credential from a new single-operator platform has none yet with employers. Treat it as portfolio evidence and structured practice - both real - not as something a hiring manager will recognise.
The membership is unproven. The board can be judged in ten minutes. The courses, the grading turnaround and the community cannot be judged from outside, and we have not tested them. The 60-day guarantee is the right way to answer that question for yourself.
The board is the funnel. Free board, membership CTA on every page. That is a legitimate and common model, and the free tier is genuinely complete rather than crippled - but be clear about which product you are evaluating when you land there.
robots.txt was not responding when we checked. Requests to the domain were refused at the robots.txt stage on 24 September 2026. That does not affect you as a browser visitor - the site loads fine - but when robots.txt errors or times out, search engines treat a site as disallowed rather than falling back to allowing everything. For a board whose product is discoverable listings, it needs fixing. It is a server configuration fault and a same-day one.
How It Compares
Against general tech job boards, getAIwork wins on focus. Search "AI jobs" on a general board and you get machine learning engineering roles; the evaluation, annotation and expert-interview work is either absent or unfindable.
Against going direct to micro1 or Mercor, getAIwork wins on breadth and filtering and loses on nothing, since browsing is free. Using both is the obvious move.
Against the paid "AI career" course market, the $49/month membership competes in a crowded and largely disreputable category. Its differentiator is the published editorial rules and the refusal to promise income - which distinguishes it from most competitors on honesty rather than on outcomes. Whether the courses are good is a separate question we have not answered.
Verdict
Use the board. It costs nothing and it is the best-organised view of AI contract work we have found. The Licensed Profession filter alone makes it worth bookmarking if you hold a credential and want AI income without retraining, and the as-listed pay discipline means you can trust what you are reading more than on most boards.
The $49/month membership is a genuine question mark rather than a red flag. The operator is named and reachable, the editorial rules are stricter than most publishers manage, the guarantee is 60 days, and cancelling is two clicks. Those are the markers of someone operating in good faith. What is unproven is whether the courses and the certification deliver, and no amount of good faith substitutes for that.
Our recommendation: browse the board first, for free, for a fortnight. If the listings in your category are worth applying to, you already have the value. If you then want the training around it, the 60-day guarantee means the membership costs you a decision rather than money.
See the full getAIwork listing, category and user reviews on AIToolsRecap.
Disclosure: getAIwork is an AIToolsRecap advertiser. This review was written to the same standard as our unpaid coverage and was not shown to them before publication.