Head-to-Head Comparison

ChatGPT (GPT-4o) vs Qwen 2.5 (72B)

A detailed head-to-head comparison of ChatGPT (GPT-4o) (OpenAI) and Qwen 2.5 (72B) (Alibaba) across 34 scored criteria.

👁 9 views 📅 First compared Aug 19, 2026 📊 34 criteria scored 🕓 Scores reviewed Mar 2026

🏆 Winner

🤖

ChatGPT (GPT-4o)

OpenAI

The world's most-used AI assistant

$20/mo (Plus)Free tierAPIAgents

Intelligence

9.1

Coding

9.2

Creativity

8.9

Usability

8.8

Pricing

7.9

Visit website ↗

🤖

Qwen 2.5 (72B)

Alibaba

Alibaba's multilingual open model

Free (self-host)Free tierOpen SourceAPI

Intelligence

8.4

Coding

8.2

Creativity

7.7

Usability

7.5

Pricing

8.1

Visit website ↗

✓

Why trust this comparison? AIToolsRecap independently scores AI tools across 34 criteria. Trusted by 1,400+ AI practitioners · No sponsored rankings · No affiliate bias.

★★★★★

📝 Text ✓ ✓

🖼️ Image ✓ ✗

🎤 Voice ✓ ✗

🎬 Video ✗ ✗

💻 Code ✓ ✓

🤖 Agents ✓ ✗

🔌 API ✓ ✓

🆓 Free ✓ ✓

📖 Open Source ✗ ✓

Criterion

ChatGPT (GPT-4o)

Qwen 2.5 (72B)

🧠 Core Intelligence

9.1 8.4

Overall IntelligenceComposite AI intelligence rating

9.5

◀

8.5

Reasoning AbilityLogical / chain-of-thought

9.3

◀

8.5

Factual AccuracyCorrectness on knowledge queries

9.0

◀

8.5

Context HandlingLong-context / big document handling

9.2

◀

8.8

Instruction FollowingComplex prompt adherence

9.4

◀

8.5

Hallucination ResistanceHigher = less hallucination

8.0

◀

7.8

💻 Technical & Coding

9.2 8.2

Coding (General)Broad software development tasks

9.2

◀

8.5

Debugging SkillFinding & fixing bugs

9.0

◀

8.2

Code ExplanationExplaining code in plain English

9.0

◀

8.2

Multi-language SupportPython, JS, C#, Go, Rust…

9.5

◀

8.5

System DesignArchitecture & scalability

9.0

◀

8.0

API / IntegrationREST, GraphQL, SDK knowledge

9.2

◀

8.0

🎨 Creativity & Content

8.9 7.7

CreativityOriginality and novel ideas

9.3

◀

8.0

Writing QualityBlogs, articles, long-form

9.2

◀

8.2

Marketing CopyAds, headlines, hooks

9.0

◀

7.5

StorytellingNarrative & fiction

9.1

◀

7.8

Image GenerationNULL if not supported

8.5

— (N/A)

Design UnderstandingUI/UX suggestions

8.5

◀

7.0

🧑‍💼 Practical Use Cases

9.0 7.7

Business UseReports, strategy, analysis

9.2

◀

7.8

SEO ContentSearch-optimised writing

8.8

◀

7.5

Research & SummarizationCondensing complex info

9.3

◀

8.5

Productivity AutomationTask & workflow automation

9.0

◀

7.5

Agent CapabilityAutonomous multi-step workflows

8.5

◀

7.0

⚡ Performance & Usability

8.8 7.5

SpeedResponse latency

8.5

◀

8.0

Ease of UseUX and onboarding

9.5

◀

7.5

CustomizationPrompts, tools, plugins

9.0

Memory / PersonalizationCross-session memory

7.5

◀

5.5

Multimodal SupportText, image, voice, video

9.5

◀

7.5

🔒 Reliability & Ecosystem

9.4 7.5

Reliability / StabilityUptime and consistent output

9.0

◀

7.5

EcosystemPlugins, API, integrations

9.8

◀

7.5

💰 Pricing & Enterprise

7.9 8.1

Pricing ValueValue for money

7.5

▶

9.5

API PricingCost per token / call

7.8

▶

9.0

Enterprise ReadinessSSO, SLA, admin controls

9.2

◀

7.0

Privacy & SecurityData handling & compliance

7.0

Feature Support

Feature	ChatGPT (GPT-4o)	Qwen 2.5 (72B)
Text generation	✓	✓
Image generation	✓	✗
Voice / audio	✓	✗
Video	✗	✗
Code assistance	✓	✓
Agent / autonomy	✓	✗
Public API	✓	✓
Free tier	✓	✓
Open source	✗	✓

⚖️

Our Verdict

ChatGPT (GPT-4o) leads on overall intelligence (9.5 vs 8.5). ChatGPT (GPT-4o) is the stronger pick for coding. ChatGPT (GPT-4o) shines for writing and content. For speed ChatGPT (GPT-4o) has the edge, and on pricing value Qwen 2.5 (72B) offers more for the money.

🔖

Want to save this comparison?

✓ Saved comparisons — revisit any time
✓ Personalised tool recommendations
✓ Full score access across 100+ tools

Join Free — 30 seconds →

Not what you were looking for?

Compare any two AI tools →

ChatGPT (GPT-4o) vs Qwen 2.5 (72B)

Feature Support

Users who viewed this also compared: