Head-to-Head Comparison

Gemma 4 (31B / 26B MoE) vs Claude 4 (Sonnet/Opus)

A detailed head-to-head comparison of Gemma 4 (31B / 26B MoE) (Google DeepMind) and Claude 4 (Sonnet/Opus) (Anthropic) across 34 scored criteria.

👁 14 views 📅 First compared Apr 17, 2026 📊 34 criteria scored

🤖

Gemma 4 (31B / 26B MoE)

Google DeepMind

Byte for byte, the most capable open models

Free (Apache 2.0 / self-host)Free tierOpen SourceAPIAgents

Intelligence

8.9

Coding

8.8

Creativity

8.3

Usability

8.2

Pricing

9.0

Visit website ↗

🏆 Winner

🤖

Claude 4 (Sonnet/Opus)

Anthropic

Helpful, harmless, and honest AI

$20/mo (Pro)Free tierAPIAgents

Intelligence

9.4

Coding

9.1

Creativity

9.2

Usability

8.2

Pricing

8.7

Visit website ↗

📝 Text ✓ ✓

🖼️ Image ✓ ✓

🎤 Voice ✓ ✗

🎬 Video ✓ ✗

💻 Code ✓ ✓

🤖 Agents ✓ ✓

🔌 API ✓ ✓

🆓 Free ✓ ✓

📖 Open Source ✓ ✗

Criterion

Gemma 4 (31B / 26B MoE)

Claude 4 (Sonnet/Opus)

🧠 Core Intelligence

8.9 9.4

Overall IntelligenceComposite AI intelligence rating

9.0

▶

9.4

Reasoning AbilityLogical / chain-of-thought

9.2

▶

9.5

Factual AccuracyCorrectness on knowledge queries

8.8

▶

9.2

Context HandlingLong-context / big document handling

9.0

▶

9.5

Instruction FollowingComplex prompt adherence

9.0

▶

9.6

Hallucination ResistanceHigher = less hallucination

8.5

▶

9.2

💻 Technical & Coding

8.8 9.1

Coding (General)Broad software development tasks

9.0

Debugging SkillFinding & fixing bugs

8.8

Code ExplanationExplaining code in plain English

9.0

▶

9.5

Multi-language SupportPython, JS, C#, Go, Rust…

9.0

System DesignArchitecture & scalability

8.5

▶

9.2

API / IntegrationREST, GraphQL, SDK knowledge

8.5

▶

9.0

🎨 Creativity & Content

8.3 9.2

CreativityOriginality and novel ideas

8.5

▶

9.2

Writing QualityBlogs, articles, long-form

8.8

▶

9.6

Marketing CopyAds, headlines, hooks

8.0

▶

9.0

StorytellingNarrative & fiction

8.5

▶

9.4

Image GenerationNULL if not supported

— (N/A)

Design UnderstandingUI/UX suggestions

7.5

▶

8.8

🧑‍💼 Practical Use Cases

8.4 9.0

Business UseReports, strategy, analysis

8.5

▶

9.3

SEO ContentSearch-optimised writing

7.8

▶

8.5

Research & SummarizationCondensing complex info

9.0

▶

9.5

Productivity AutomationTask & workflow automation

8.5

▶

9.0

Agent CapabilityAutonomous multi-step workflows

8.0

▶

8.8

⚡ Performance & Usability

8.2 8.2

SpeedResponse latency

8.8

◀

8.0

Ease of UseUX and onboarding

8.0

▶

9.2

CustomizationPrompts, tools, plugins

9.5

◀

8.5

Memory / PersonalizationCross-session memory

5.5

▶

7.0

Multimodal SupportText, image, voice, video

9.2

◀

8.5

🔒 Reliability & Ecosystem

8.8 8.8

Reliability / StabilityUptime and consistent output

8.5

▶

9.2

EcosystemPlugins, API, integrations

9.0

◀

8.5

💰 Pricing & Enterprise

9.0 8.7

Pricing ValueValue for money

9.8

◀

8.0

API PricingCost per token / call

9.5

◀

8.2

Enterprise ReadinessSSO, SLA, admin controls

8.0

▶

9.0

Privacy & SecurityData handling & compliance

8.5

▶

9.5

Feature Support

Feature	Gemma 4 (31B / 26B MoE)	Claude 4 (Sonnet/Opus)
Text generation	✓	✓
Image generation	✓	✓
Voice / audio	✓	✗
Video	✓	✗
Code assistance	✓	✓
Agent / autonomy	✓	✓
Public API	✓	✓
Free tier	✓	✓
Open source	✓	✗

⚖️

Our Verdict

Gemma 4 (31B / 26B MoE) and Claude 4 (Sonnet/Opus) are closely matched on overall intelligence. Gemma 4 (31B / 26B MoE) is the stronger pick for coding. Claude 4 (Sonnet/Opus) shines for writing and content. For speed Gemma 4 (31B / 26B MoE) has the edge, and on pricing value Gemma 4 (31B / 26B MoE) offers more for the money.

Want to compare different tools?

← Back to Compare Tool

Gemma 4 (31B / 26B MoE) vs Claude 4 (Sonnet/Opus)

Feature Support

Related Comparisons