SAT, OCTOBER 03, 2026
Independent · In‑Depth · Practitioner‑Tested
Claude Productivity

Six Prompts to Map Who Your AI Actually Depends On

SpaceX's IPO filing disclosed that Anthropic pays $1.25 billion a month to rent 300MW inside xAI's buildings, on a contract either side can end in 90 days - while Anthropic's own prospectus describes 80% of its compute obligations as non-cancelable. Two filings, same money, different characterisation. If the frontier labs find their own dependency chains hard to describe accurately, yours is almost certainly undrawn. These six prompts map it, price the exits, and tell you which failures you could actually survive.

⌨️ 6 prompts 🕐 Updated Oct 2, 2026
💡 How to use these prompts: Replace everything in [BRACKETS] with your specific details before sending. Click Copy to copy any prompt to your clipboard instantly.
1
Draw the Chain Past the First Hop
Most teams list vendors and stop. The risk lives two hops down, where "three providers" turns out to be one data centre.
Here is what my product uses: [list every AI API, model, hosting provider, vector store, and any tool with AI inside it].<br/><br/>For each one, work out the chain underneath it as far as public information goes - who they run on, whose models they resell, whose silicon it ends on.<br/><br/>Then tell me where two or more of my supposedly separate dependencies converge on the same company. Those convergence points are my real single points of failure, not the vendors on my invoice list.<br/><br/>Where the chain is not public, say so and mark it unknown rather than guessing.
2
Read Your Own Contract Back to You
OpenAI shut down Sora 2 and its Videos API with no replacement in September. Deprecation notice periods are not boilerplate.
Here is the relevant section of my agreement with an AI provider: [paste terms].<br/><br/>Tell me, in plain language:<br/>- how much notice either side must give to end it<br/>- what happens to my data and my fine-tunes if it ends<br/>- whether they can deprecate the specific model I depend on, and with how much warning<br/>- whether price is fixed, indexed, or at their discretion<br/>- what I am committed to pay even if I stop using it<br/><br/>Then tell me which of those terms would hurt most if exercised tomorrow.
3
Price the Exit Before You Need It
The answer is usually "three weeks if we prepared, three months if we did not". That gap is the thing worth buying down.
Assume my main model provider doubles its price, deprecates the model I use, or becomes unavailable in my region.<br/><br/>Walk me through what switching would actually cost: engineering time to re-integrate, prompt and evaluation rework, output quality regression, re-testing, and anything I would simply lose.<br/><br/>Give me a rough number of person-weeks and say which part of it is unavoidable versus which part I could pre-pay now by building differently.<br/><br/>MY SETUP:<br/>[architecture, how the model is called, how prompts are managed]
4
Find What Is Hard-Coded to One Vendor
Prompt phrasing tuned to one model is the dependency nobody counts, and often the most expensive one to unpick.
Here is how my application calls its model: [paste the integration code or describe it].<br/><br/>Identify everything that is specific to this provider and would break on another: SDK calls, response shapes, tool-calling format, token counting, streaming behaviour, system prompt conventions, model-specific prompt phrasing, safety-refusal handling.<br/><br/>Rank them by how much work each would be to abstract, and tell me which three are worth abstracting now and which are cheap to fix later.<br/><br/>Do not recommend a framework. Tell me what to change in what I already have.
5
Work Out Which Failure You Could Not Survive
Category 3 should be a very short list. If it is not, that is the finding.
Here is my dependency list and my business model: [paste].<br/><br/>For each dependency, tell me what happens to my product and my revenue if it disappears with 90 days notice. Sort into:<br/>1. Degraded but operating<br/>2. Broken until we rebuild<br/>3. Business over<br/><br/>Be blunt about category 3. Then tell me what the cheapest meaningful insurance is for each category 3 item - not the ideal fix, the cheapest one that moves it to category 2.<br/><br/>If nothing is in category 3, say so instead of inventing drama.
6
Decide What Concentration You Are Willing to Accept
Multi-provider is not automatically right. For a small team it is often a tax on shipping. Decide it deliberately rather than by default.
Argue both sides honestly for my situation.<br/><br/>FOR consolidating on one AI provider: simpler integration, volume pricing, less prompt maintenance, one relationship to manage, faster shipping.<br/>AGAINST: pricing power sits with them, deprecation risk, regional availability, and no leverage in any negotiation.<br/><br/>Then tell me which my situation actually supports given my size, margins and switching cost - and what I should do differently in either case.<br/><br/>SITUATION:<br/>[team size, revenue, margin, how central AI is to the product]