[USE DEEPSEEK V4 FLASH FOR THIS — thinking OFF for speed]
[Model: deepseek-v4-flash, thinking: disabled]
Generate [NUMBER] variations of the following content piece. Each variation should differ meaningfully in angle, tone, or structure — not just synonyms.
Content type: [SOCIAL POST / EMAIL SUBJECT LINE / AD HEADLINE / PRODUCT DESCRIPTION]
Core message: [THE ONE THING EVERY VARIATION MUST COMMUNICATE]
Target audience: [WHO READS THIS]
Constraints: [MAX LENGTH, PLATFORM, TONE RULES]
Output format: numbered list, one variation per line, no explanations.
Content to vary: [PASTE ORIGINAL OR BRIEF]
[USE DEEPSEEK V4 PRO WITH THINKING ON]
Before writing anything, reason through the best structure for this article. Think carefully about what the reader needs to know, in what order, and why.
Article topic: [TOPIC]
Target reader: [WHO AND THEIR KNOWLEDGE LEVEL]
Goal: [WHAT SHOULD THE READER DO OR BELIEVE AFTER READING]
Length: [APPROXIMATE WORD COUNT]
Key constraint: [WHAT TO AVOID OR INCLUDE]
First: show your reasoning about structure. Why this order? What does each section accomplish? What would be lost if a section were cut?
Then: produce the final outline with section titles and one-line descriptions.
Rewrite the following content for a completely different audience. The core information stays the same — everything else should change.
Original audience: [WHO THE ORIGINAL WAS WRITTEN FOR]
New audience: [WHO THE REWRITE IS FOR]
What changes: vocabulary, analogies, assumed knowledge, tone, examples
What stays: the core facts, key message, and structure
Show me: one paragraph from the original vs the rewritten version side by side, then deliver the full rewrite.
Original content: [PASTE]
[USE V4 PRO WITH THINKING ON — this requires careful reasoning]
Write a technical explainer on the following topic. Every sentence must contain a specific fact, number, or mechanism — no filler, no general statements.
Topic: [TECHNICAL SUBJECT]
Audience: [TECHNICAL LEVEL — junior / senior / expert]
Length: [WORD COUNT]
Key facts to include: [LIST ANY SPECIFIC DATA POINTS YOU WANT COVERED]
Rules:
- If you cannot cite a specific number, describe the mechanism precisely instead
- No phrases like "AI is transforming" or "in today's world"
- Every paragraph must advance the reader's understanding, not repeat it
Use extended reasoning to plan the factual structure before writing.
Write a complete newsletter issue from the following raw notes. The output should be ready to send with minimal editing.
Newsletter name / brand: [NAME]
Audience: [WHO SUBSCRIBES]
Tone: [VOICE — professional / casual / opinionated / neutral]
Length: [APPROXIMATE WORD COUNT]
Format: [SECTIONS YOU TYPICALLY INCLUDE — e.g. intro, 3 stories, tool tip, CTA]
Raw notes for this issue: [PASTE YOUR UNPOLISHED NOTES, LINKS, THOUGHTS]
Produce the complete issue. Where my notes are thin on a section, use your judgment to fill it out in my voice based on the tone and style described.
[V4 PRO THINKING ON — this is a reasoning task]
I need a rigorous comparison of two opposing arguments on the following topic. Do not take a side — steelman both.
Topic: [THE QUESTION OR DEBATE]
Argument A: [SUMMARISE ONE POSITION]
Argument B: [SUMMARISE THE OPPOSING POSITION]
For each argument:
1. The strongest version of the case (steelman)
2. The best evidence supporting it
3. The weakest point that critics target
4. What would have to be true for this argument to be correct
Then: identify the crux — the single factual or value disagreement that most explains why people reach different conclusions.