💡 How to use these prompts:
Replace everything in [BRACKETS] with your specific details before sending.
Click Copy to copy any prompt to your clipboard instantly.
[THINKING MODE IS ON BY DEFAULT IN V4 FLASH — this prompt benefits from extended reasoning] Synthesize the following research materials on [TOPIC]. Work through this systematically: 1. Identify the main claims across all sources 2. Find where sources agree and where they conflict 3. Assess the strength of evidence for each major claim 4. Identify what is missing from the research 5. Produce a structured synthesis with citations Sources: [PASTE ALL MATERIALS]
Conduct a detailed competitive analysis of [COMPANY/PRODUCT] vs [COMPETITOR 1] and [COMPETITOR 2]. Think through this carefully before responding. I need: 1. Market positioning of each — what job are they hiring them to do? 2. Pricing and business model comparison 3. Target customer differences 4. Strengths and weaknesses of each 5. Strategic trajectory — where is each heading? 6. Direct verdict: who wins for which customer type and why Be specific. No vague generalities.
Please fact-check the following claim. Think through this step by step before answering: "[CLAIM]" 1. Break down the specific assertions in the claim 2. Evaluate each assertion separately 3. Identify the strongest evidence for and against each 4. Note where your confidence is high vs uncertain 5. Give your overall assessment with reasoning Show your reasoning — do not just give a verdict.
Write a structured market research report on [MARKET/INDUSTRY]. Use extended reasoning to ensure completeness. Structure: 1. Market overview and size 2. Key players and market share estimates 3. Primary customer segments and their needs 4. Major trends driving the market 5. Key risks and headwinds 6. Opportunity gaps 7. 3-5 specific recommendations For each section, flag your confidence level and any data gaps.
I believe [YOUR POSITION OR PLAN]. Use your extended reasoning capability to give me the strongest possible case AGAINST this position. Think through all angles: 1. The 5 most compelling arguments against it 2. Evidence or examples that undermine it 3. What I am probably overestimating 4. What I am probably underestimating 5. The conditions under which I would be completely wrong Do not soften the critique. I need the strongest version of the counterargument.
I need to make a decision: [DESCRIBE THE DECISION]. Work through this systematically: Step 1: Clarify what I am actually deciding (restate the decision precisely) Step 2: List all viable options (include options I may not have considered) Step 3: For each option, map the likely consequences Step 4: Identify the key assumptions I am making Step 5: Give a clear recommendation with the reasoning chain Step 6: Identify what would change your recommendation My context: [RELEVANT DETAILS]