Here is a list of my published pages with their titles and opening paragraphs.<br/><br/>Sort them by how likely each is to be used as source material in an AI-generated answer, and say why for each.<br/><br/>The pages at highest risk are the ones that answer a specific question completely and early. The ones at lowest risk need the reader to work through them, or carry something that cannot be summarised - original data, a tested result, a judgement.<br/><br/>Then tell me which of my pages are in the worst position: high extraction value, low reason to click through.<br/><br/>PAGES:<br/>[paste]
Here is a page of mine: [paste].<br/><br/>Separate its content into:<br/>1. Facts available from a dozen other sources<br/>2. Facts available but hard to find or assemble<br/>3. Things only I can state - my own measurements, tests, data, or direct experience<br/><br/>Tell me what proportion falls in each, and what the page would still be worth if categories 1 and 2 were summarised elsewhere.<br/><br/>If category 3 is empty, say so plainly rather than being generous about it.
I am going to paste how several AI assistants answered the same question about my topic.<br/><br/>For each: did it cite me, cite a competitor, or answer without attribution? If it used something recognisably from my page without citing it, quote the overlap.<br/><br/>Then tell me what the ones that cited me had in common - page structure, data, specificity, recency - and what the ones that did not had in common.<br/><br/>ANSWERS:<br/>[paste responses from different assistants]
Here is a page that is being summarised in AI answers without sending me traffic: [paste].<br/><br/>Restructure it so the summary is useful but incomplete without the page. Specifically:<br/>- lead with a finding that invites the question "according to whom?"<br/>- put the method, the caveats and the full data where a summary will not reach<br/>- make the claim attributable, so quoting it means naming me<br/><br/>Do not make it worse to read. If the only way to protect it is to make it annoying, say so and I will leave it alone.
Help me assemble the record of how my content is being used in AI answers, in a form I could put in front of a platform, a partner or a lawyer.<br/><br/>Tell me what to capture and how: query, assistant, date, whether my page was cited, what was quoted, whether a link appeared, and what the user would have had to click to get the same thing.<br/><br/>Design it so a sample taken over several months is defensible rather than anecdotal - sampling method, sample size, what would make it biased.<br/><br/>CONTEXT:<br/>[your site and topic area]
Assume the legal route to compensation for AI use of my content is closed for a site my size.<br/><br/>Given that, help me decide what outcome I am actually pursuing. Argue each honestly:<br/>- citation and brand presence in answers, accepting fewer clicks<br/>- withholding content from crawlers and losing the presence<br/>- a direct commercial arrangement, if I am large enough to be worth one<br/>- changing what I publish so the answer cannot replace the visit<br/><br/>Tell me which my situation actually supports, and what I would be giving up.<br/><br/>SITUATION:<br/>[traffic, size, revenue model, topic]