Write subject lines for this email.\n\nEmail body: [PASTE]\nAudience: [DESCRIBE]\nRelationship: [COLD, OPTED IN, EXISTING CUSTOMER]\n\nGive 10 options across these types: the specific fact, the direct question, the plain statement of what is inside, and the number or date.\n\nFor each, give the character count and say what makes someone open it. Then mark any option that would feel like a bait once the email is opened, and delete it. Avoid: Quick question, Following up, Checking in, and anything with an emoji.
Cut this email to half its length without losing anything that matters.\n\nEmail: [PASTE]\nThe one thing the reader must do: [DESCRIBE]\n\n1. Mark every sentence as ESSENTIAL, SUPPORTING or FILLER.\n2. Delete all filler and show the result.\n3. Rewrite the opener so it starts at the point rather than approaching it.\n4. Give the before and after word counts.\n\nFiller includes: hoping this finds you well, wanted to reach out, as you may know, I am writing to, and any sentence explaining what the next sentence will say.
Write a cold email.\n\nWho I am: [DESCRIBE]\nWho I am writing to: [ROLE, COMPANY, AND WHAT I ACTUALLY KNOW ABOUT THEM]\nWhat I want: [THE SPECIFIC ASK]\nWhy them specifically: [THE REAL REASON]\n\nRules:\n- Under 120 words\n- The first line must be something only I could write to only them\n- One ask, phrased so that no is easy\n- No compliment about their work unless I supplied a specific detail\n\nIf what I gave you is not enough to write a genuinely specific opener, tell me what to find out rather than inventing one.
Turn this into an email sequence.\n\nCore message: [PASTE]\nAudience: [DESCRIBE]\nGoal: [THE ACTION]\nNumber of emails: [N]\n\nEach email must make a different argument, not restate the last one more loudly. For each: the send timing, the angle, the subject line, the body, and the reason someone who ignored the previous email would read this one.\n\nThe final email should make it easy to opt out of the sequence without opting out of the relationship.
This copy describes what the product does. Rewrite it around what changes for the reader.\n\nCurrent copy: [PASTE]\nWho it is for: [DESCRIBE]\nWhat their day looks like now: [DESCRIBE]\n\n1. Put each feature in a table next to the outcome it produces and the frustration it removes.\n2. Rewrite using outcomes, keeping features only where the reader is technical enough to want them.\n3. Flag any outcome I cannot substantiate, and say what evidence would be needed.\n\nDo not add claims I did not give you.
Write to a customer who has gone quiet.\n\nRelationship history: [DESCRIBE]\nHow long quiet: [DURATION]\nWhat changed since: [PRODUCT CHANGES, IF ANY]\n\nWrite two versions:\n1. One that assumes they are busy and gives them an easy way back.\n2. One that assumes they lost interest and asks directly why, with no pitch.\n\nBoth under 90 words. Neither may use guilt, false urgency, or a discount as the opening move. Say which version you would send and why.
This email did worse than expected.\n\nEmail: [PASTE]\nAudience and size: [DESCRIBE]\nOpen rate, click rate, replies: [PASTE]\nWhat I expected: [PASTE]\n\nWork out where it failed: the list, the subject line, the opening, the offer or the ask. Use the metrics to narrow it - a low open rate is not a copy problem.\n\nGive the single change most likely to fix it, the reasoning, and how to test that it worked. Be willing to say the list or the timing was the problem and the copy was fine.
Turn this designed email into plain text that reads like a person wrote it.\n\nDesigned email: [PASTE]\nSender: [WHO IT COMES FROM, AND THEIR ACTUAL ROLE]\n\nRules: no headers, no buttons, one link at most, short paragraphs, and a sign-off that matches how that person really writes.\n\nKeep the substance and drop the structure. If the designed version only works because of its layout, say so - that usually means the message is thinner than it looks.
Write a value proposition.\n\nProduct: [DESCRIBE]\nCustomer: [DESCRIBE]\nWhat they use now: [DESCRIBE]\nProof I have: [NUMBERS, CASE STUDIES, OR NONE]\n\nGive 5 options, each one sentence, each naming a specific change for the customer rather than a quality of the product.\n\nThen stress-test each: could a competitor say the same sentence? If yes, it is not a value proposition. Rewrite the survivors to be unsayable by anyone else.
Rewrite this to match how I actually write.\n\nEmail to rewrite: [PASTE]\nThree things I have written myself: [PASTE SAMPLES]\n\n1. Describe my voice in specifics: sentence length, formality, how I open, how I ask for things, words I use and words I clearly avoid.\n2. Rewrite the email in that voice.\n3. Point out anywhere the original contained phrasing I would never use.\n\nDo not smooth my voice into something more polished. The point is that it sounds like me.