💡 How to use these prompts:
Replace everything in [BRACKETS] with your specific details before sending.
Click Copy to copy any prompt to your clipboard instantly.
Here is a vendor safety page: [PASTE]. For each safety claim, split it into (a) the claim, (b) the mechanism named to deliver it, (c) whether the mechanism is described specifically enough to verify. Flag every claim where (b) or (c) is missing. Do not evaluate whether the claims are good, only whether they are checkable.
Read this product documentation: [PASTE]. Identify every statement about users under 18 or vulnerable users. Then list what the documentation does NOT say: what happens when age verification fails, what the default is for an unverified user, and who is accountable. Present as a two column table of stated versus unstated.
Given this vendor incident policy: [PASTE]. Walk through a hypothetical where the model gives harmful output to one of our users. At each step name who is notified, within what deadline, and what the vendor commits to do. Mark every step where the policy is silent or uses words like promptly or reasonable without a number.
I will give you two documents: a vendor marketing page and the matching terms of service. Marketing: [PASTE]. Terms: [PASTE]. List every place the terms limit, disclaim or contradict something the marketing asserts. Quote both sides for each finding. Order by how much the gap would cost us if it mattered.
Based on everything in this vendor pack: [PASTE]. Write the ten questions I should send the vendor before signing, ranked by how much the answer would change my decision. Each question must be answerable with a document or a number, not an opinion. Do not include questions the pack already answers.