💡 How to use these prompts:
Replace everything in [BRACKETS] with your specific details before sending.
Click Copy to copy any prompt to your clipboard instantly.
You have the full document set in context. Before summarising anything, produce an index: for each document, give the title, the date, the document type, and one line on what it decides or records. Number them. Do not summarise the content yet. If any document has no clear date, say so explicitly rather than guessing.
Across all documents in context, list every place where two documents state something incompatible. For each, quote both passages verbatim and give the document number and section for each. Rank them by how much the contradiction would matter to someone relying on these documents. Do not include differences of emphasis, only factual conflicts.
Find the earliest document in context that states the following claim, then trace how it was restated in every later document. Quote each version with its document number. Tell me whether the claim changed as it was repeated, and if so, where the change was introduced.
Answer the following question using only the documents in context. For every sentence of your answer, cite the document number and section it came from. If the documents do not contain enough to answer, say exactly what is missing instead of filling the gap from general knowledge.
Given the document set in context and the stated purpose below, list what a complete set would contain that is missing here. Be specific: name the document type and what it would establish. Do not list things that would merely be nice to have.
Produce a brief for a reader who has seen none of these documents and has ten minutes. Lead with what they must act on. Then the three facts that most constrain their options. Then anything unresolved. Cite document numbers throughout. Nothing that does not change a decision.