SUN, NOVEMBER 08, 2026
Independent · In‑Depth · Practitioner‑Tested
LLMs

Inkling 2 Small vs Kimi K3.1 Pro: Open Weights?

One of these has published weights. The other has a promise and a safety review.

🕐 8 min read 👁 16 views 📅 Nov 8, 2026
The short answer
● Inkling 2 Small — 594B total, 17B active, weights not yet released
● Kimi K3.1 Pro — 2.8T total, 104B active, weights on Hugging Face
● Cost per task — $1.18 for Inkling, per Artificial Analysis
● Coding — Kimi narrowly leads SWEBench Pro v2 Hard
● Available now — Kimi. Inkling runs only on Tinker

Both are being described as the leading open-weight model. Only one of them has published weights, which makes the comparison simpler than the coverage suggests.

Inkling 2 Small Kimi K3.1 Pro
Lab Thinking Machines Moonshot AI
Released 6 November 2026 23 October 2026
Parameters 594B total, 17B active 2.8T total, 104B active
Weights available No, Apache 2.0 promised Yes, modified MIT
Where to run it Tinker platform only Hosted or self-hosted
Input Text and image Multimodal
SWEBench Pro v2 Hard 86.3% Narrowly ahead
Hosted price $1.18 per task $2.00 / $10.00 per million

If you need weights today

Kimi K3.1 Pro, and it is not close. The weights are published at moonshotai/Kimi-K3.1-Pro under a modified MIT licence, so you can self-host. Modified means standard MIT semantics do not carry over, so read the file before you assume anything.

Inkling 2 Small is a proprietary offering on Tinker today. Thinking Machines says Apache 2.0 weights follow once external safety testing finishes, and has given no date. If your plan depends on self-hosting, you cannot plan around it yet.

If you are buying hosted inference

Artificial Analysis puts Inkling 2 Small at roughly 150,000 output tokens per task and $1.18 per task, against $7.77 for Gemini 3.8 Flash and $10.02 for Claude Sonnet 5.5. That is the strongest argument for it, and it holds whether the weights ever ship or not.

One figure to read carefully: Inkling’s hallucination rate fell from 61% to 27%, but its response rate fell from 77% to 53%. Part of the accuracy gain is the model answering fewer questions. Whether that is a feature depends entirely on your workload.

The honest verdict

Kimi K3.1 Pro if you want to run it yourself or you are optimising for coding. Inkling 2 Small if you are buying hosted inference and cost per task is the number that decides it. Neither answer changes until Thinking Machines actually publishes the weights.

Sources: The Decoder · Yotta Labs.

Published 8 November 2026. Every figure above was checked against the reporting linked here on the same day.

⚖ Our Verdict

Kimi K3.1 Pro if you need weights today or you are optimising for coding. Inkling 2 Small if you are buying hosted inference and $1.18 per task is the deciding number.