FRI, NOVEMBER 13, 2026
Independent · In‑Depth · Practitioner‑Tested
Large Language Models

Gemini 4 Hydrogen vs Argon: Smaller Model, Higher Score

Hydrogen scores 51 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index against Argon at 50, and leads SWE-sweep 13.5% to 4.3%. Argon keeps Chartography, GraphWalks and SEC-bench Pro. Every figure from Googles own benchmark table, published 12 November 2026.

🕐 8 min read 👁 25 views 📅 Nov 13, 2026
Gemini 4 Hydrogen
AA Index 51. SWE-sweep 13.5%. $1.50/$7.50 per million, flat across 1M context.
— / 10
$1.50 / $7.50 per 1M
Full Review →
Gemini 4 Argon
AA Index 50. Leads Chartography, GraphWalks and SEC-bench Pro. Price doubles 1 Dec.
— / 10
$2 / $10 per 1M until 30 Nov
Full Review →

● Short answer: Hydrogen for agents and tool use. Argon for heavy reasoning. The smaller model wins more benchmarks than the bigger one.
● Index: Hydrogen 51 at high and 54 at xhigh. Argon 50.
● Agentic coding: SWE-sweep 13.5% against 4.3%. Not close.
● Where Argon still wins: Chartography 71.6% to 66.6%, plus GraphWalks and SEC-bench Pro where Hydrogen has no published figure.

Google shipped Gemini 4 Argon as its flagship, then shipped Gemini 4 Hydrogen four weeks later and Hydrogen scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. That is an unusual thing for a vendor to publish about its own lineup, and it is worth understanding before you pick one.

The published numbers

Benchmark Gemini 4 Hydrogen Gemini 4 Argon
AA Intelligence Index 51 high, 54 xhigh 50
SWE-sweep, agentic coding 13.5% 4.3%
Agents’ Last Exam v1.1 71.6% 69.0%
OSWorld-2.1, offline subset 77.6% 74.7%
Vending-Bench 2, end balance $14,549 $13,718
Chartography 66.6% 71.6%
GraphWalks not published 84.2%
SEC-bench Pro not published 83.4%
Terminal-Bench 4.0 not published 57.1%

Read the blanks. Three of Argon’s strongest results have no Hydrogen figure beside them. That is not Hydrogen losing those benchmarks — it is Google choosing not to publish them, which usually means the number was not flattering. Treat the bottom three rows as Argon territory rather than as Hydrogen failures.

Price, and the part that changes your bill

Hydrogen is $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 output, with cache hits at $0.075. The detail that matters more than the headline: that rate is flat across the entire 1M-token context rather than stepping up past a threshold. Long-context work does not get repriced mid-request.

Artificial Analysis puts cost per task at $0.29 at low effort, $0.80 at medium, $1.87 at high and $3.16 at xhigh. So the xhigh tier that buys you 54 on the index instead of 51 costs roughly 1.7 times a high-effort run. Three index points is rarely worth that.

Which one, concretely

If you are… Pick
Running agents or tool-heavy workflows Hydrogen. SWE-sweep is three times Argon.
Doing deep multi-step reasoning Argon. GraphWalks and SEC-bench Pro are its ground.
Reading charts and documents Argon, 71.6% to 66.6% on Chartography.
Watching latency Hydrogen. 2.5x faster than 3.8 Flash at default.
On a tight budget Hydrogen at low effort, $0.29 per task.
Already on Gemini 3.8 Flash Hydrogen. It triples Terminal-Bench 4.1 and cuts fabricated claims more than fivefold.

Listings: Gemini 4 Hydrogen. Background: the launch in full.

Sources

⚖ Our Verdict

Hydrogen for agents, tool use and anything latency-sensitive, at $1.50/$7.50 per million flat across 1M context. Argon for deep reasoning, chart reading and document work. The three benchmarks Google left blank for Hydrogen are the clearest signal of where Argon still belongs.